karnataka: Hc Rejects Student’s Plea For Mop-up Round Entry | Bengaluru News – Times of India


BENGALURU: Amended rules and stipulations by the Karnataka Examinations Authority (KEA) proved costly for a 19-year-old student, who wanted to pursue an MBBS course. Placing reliance on these aspects, the Karnataka HC rejected his petition seeking permission to participate in the mop-up round of counselling.
Dismissing the petition filed by Kalaling Police Patil, a division bench headed by Justice Alok Aradhe said the petitioner was, in fact, allotted a seat in the 2nd round of counselling and that the stipulation contained in the information bulletin of KEA clearly barred his participation in subsequent rounds. of counselling. “In the absence of a challenge to the information bulletin, the same binds the petitioner,” it said.
While the amended rule 10 of Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Government Seats in Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2006 says the government may, by order, cancel and seat selection can be made under these rules for reasons specified therein, the information bulletin read:
“Candidates who have been allotted any medical seat either in the first round (choice 1 & 2) or in the second round are not eligible to participate. “From Kalagi village in Chitapur taluk of Kalaburagi district, Kalaling was not allotted seat in the first round. In the second round on March 8, 2022, he was allotted an NRI-category seat in Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru. On March 12, he was permitted to surrender the seat.
On March 16, he submitted a representation stating that due to a technical error and mistake on his part, the seat in Sapthagiri was blocked. Due to financial reasons, he said he could not pursue the course in that institution.
Further, Kalaling stated that the choice of seat was made on the assumption that his eligibility to participate in the further round of counselling would remain intact. He sought admission to an MBBS course in KBN Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalaburagi.
However, authorities rejected the representation on March 17, citing eligibility criteria and conditions in the information bulletin. They said since the petitioner has been allotted a seat in the second round, he is not eligible for the mop-up round.
Kalaling argued that rule 10(6) of the 2006 rules permits him to participate in the mop-up and any subsequent round of counselling as he had surrendered the seat and not taken admission to the course. He said the information bulletin was not in consonance with the rules and even MCI regulations permit his participation in subsequent rounds of counselling.
The counsel for KEA informed the court that by a notification dated July 12, 2012, the rules have been amended and there is no provision to allow participation of a student in subsequent rounds of counselling.
Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement

Sagar Biswas

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.