Threatened for Choosing Rapido: A Chilling Glimpse into Bengaluru's Commuter Chaos
In what seems like a scene straight out of a dystopian tale, a Bengaluru commuter recently shared a harrowing experience of intimidation and threats from a group of auto drivers—simply for choosing to book a Rapido ride. The incident, originally shared on Reddit, highlights the volatile ground that exists between traditional public transport operators and app-based mobility platforms, as well as the growing concern over public safety and law enforcement apathy.
The commuter, after exiting a metro station in Bengaluru, attempted to book a Rapido bike ride, only to be aggressively intercepted by an auto driver who demanded he cancel the booking and travel with him instead. His refusal triggered a swift escalation, with multiple auto drivers converging and shouting threats. One even ominously warned, “You won’t be able to walk in this city”—a chilling reminder of how swiftly entitlement can morph into mob mentality.
What started as a commuter’s simple act of choice—using an affordable and app-based alternative—turned into a public spectacle of intimidation. The Rapido driver, arriving amidst the chaos, found himself surrounded as well. The confrontation escalated to physical threats, with one auto driver overtaking and blocking the Rapido, while others joined in to form a threatening circle around the commuter and his rider. The threats, according to the Reddit post, weren’t just about the ride—they hinted at a larger, more disturbing assertion of control: “Even if you know the DC, SP, nothing will happen to us. We are locals, we'll wreck havoc.”
This episode is not merely an isolated event—it is indicative of several underlying systemic issues.
1. Resistance to Change and Platform Supremacy
The hostility from the auto drivers clearly stems from the growing competition they face from ride-hailing apps like Rapido and Uber. With better pricing, reliability, and user convenience, these platforms have disrupted traditional autorickshaw services. Unfortunately, instead of adapting or competing through better service, some auto drivers have taken to bullying and coercion to protect their turf.
This kind of street-level enforcement of market dominance not only undermines a commuter’s freedom of choice but also reflects a failure of transport regulation enforcement in urban India.
2. Failure of Law Enforcement and Implicit Bias
Perhaps the most disturbing element of this episode was the reaction of the police. While the commuter did admit to flipping the group off in frustration—a move he himself regretted—the police's disproportionate response was alarming. Rather than focusing on the clear threats of violence, the officers reportedly scolded the commuter and appeared to have a disturbingly casual rapport with the aggressors.
Statements like “Hit him and send him away” allegedly made by police officers suggest more than just negligence; they hint at a bias that favors certain groups perceived as “locals” or “insiders.” Such attitudes erode public trust in law enforcement and make the city’s streets less safe for everyone—especially for those who rely on affordable transport alternatives.
3. Public Safety and Urban Anxiety
This case underscores a growing sense of urban anxiety—where the everyday act of commuting can potentially lead to confrontation or even physical danger. In a city like Bengaluru, known for its tech-savvy population and digital innovation, such incidents point to a growing disconnect between modern urban needs and outdated behavioral norms.
When the right to choose a mode of transport can provoke mob threats, the city’s social fabric stands compromised. It not only deters innovation but also reinforces the notion that street power and group intimidation trump legal systems and individual rights.
Conclusion: The Need for Immediate Reforms
This incident must serve as a wake-up call for Bengaluru’s authorities. Law enforcement agencies need to ensure they act impartially and protect citizens’ rights—regardless of who the aggressors are. Simultaneously, transport regulators must crack down on harassment by auto drivers and encourage fair competition.
Commuting should never be a confrontation. It’s high time cities prioritized commuter safety, freedom of choice, and accountability—before more such disturbing episodes become the norm rather than the exception.
0 Comments