Header Ads Widget

Tejasvi Surya Slams DK Shivakumar’s ‘Fanfare’ Over Pothole Repair Launch in Bengaluru: Optics vs Action?

Tejasvi Surya Slams DK Shivakumar’s ‘Fanfare’ Over Pothole Repair Launch in Bengaluru: Optics vs Action?

Bengaluru's infrastructure woes are back in the spotlight, not for a breakthrough or a collapse, but for what BJP MP Tejasvi Surya described as "unprecedented fanfare" around the launch of a routine pothole repair drive. On Monday, Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar flagged off the repair work at Sumanahalli Junction on Magadi Road in the Rajarajeshwari Nagar constituency—complete with garlands, rituals, and a sizeable public gathering. The optics, however, didn’t sit well with the opposition.


Tejasvi Surya Slams DK Shivakumar’s ‘Fanfare’ Over Pothole Repair Launch in Bengaluru: Optics vs Action?

Tejasvi Surya took to social media platform X to express his disapproval, stating, "I don't think anywhere in the whole world, a regular pothole repair work will be started with such fanfare!" His post further criticized the inefficiency and repeated expenses associated with Bengaluru’s pothole repairs, pointing out that cities in countries much less developed than India manage road maintenance more effectively than the tech capital of India.

At the heart of this political spar is a longstanding civic crisis—Bengaluru's deteriorating road infrastructure. Despite being a major global IT hub, the city has struggled with consistent road quality, traffic management, and public infrastructure planning. Potholes have become symbolic of this neglect, often causing accidents, traffic snarls, and public outrage.

DK Shivakumar, who also holds the Bengaluru Development portfolio, defended the initiative as part of a broader urban revival vision dubbed “Brand Bengaluru.” In his post, he emphasized not just road repairs but also plans for improved footpaths, drainage systems, and inner road infrastructure. “Emphasis is being placed on asphalting the main roads, internal main roads of the constituency for smooth traffic,” Shivakumar noted, suggesting that the event aimed to show transparency and momentum in development efforts.

The launch event's grand nature—complete with ceremonial rituals—was likely intended to signal the government's commitment to addressing civic issues. However, critics like Surya argue that such events are misplaced priorities when the real issue is the quality and consistency of the work itself. The concern is that public funds are being diverted toward ceremonies and media optics rather than actual execution and long-term results.

Beyond roads, Shivakumar also chaired a meeting on the same day to assess progress on environmental issues such as lake conservation and waste disposal. A significant directive was issued: the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) will be responsible for filling lakes with treated water to prevent contamination. Further, local administrators, including Deputy Commissioners and Zilla Panchayat CEOs, were instructed to plan for potential water shortages as summer approaches.

These broader efforts suggest a multi-pronged approach to urban development. However, the optics-driven approach continues to be debated. While government officials may argue that publicized events help build awareness and urgency, critics say they often distract from the consistent execution that cities like Bengaluru so desperately need.

What this episode truly reveals is the widening gap between political intent and public expectation. On one hand, symbolic gestures and "launches" may serve as tools for accountability, ensuring that projects are not just announced but started. On the other hand, Bengaluru residents are demanding more than symbolism—they want roads without potholes, lakes without sewage, and infrastructure that lives up to the city's global reputation.

In the end, the exchange between Surya and Shivakumar reflects a deeper civic concern: how much of governance is performance, and how much is progress? Until that balance shifts decisively in favor of outcomes over optics, the potholes—both literal and metaphorical—may keep reappearing.

Post a Comment

0 Comments